COICA is based on the same principle as other federal laws that allow the government to seize property linked to an illegal activity -- for example, the car of a drug dealer might be seized if it is proved that the car was involved in the illegal drug deals. Prior to the last set of seizures, federal agents had purchased numerous counterfeit items from these websites, such as sunglasses, sport jerseys, handbags, golf clubs, shoes and DVD sets. Jurisdiction over these domains was based on the fact that the two Internet registrars for the dot-com, dot-net and dot-org domains, the Public Internet Registry and VeriSign, are based in the United States.
The purpose of the law was to go beyond punishing copyright infringement for specific items and actually stop the mechanism for the distribution of such items. The law stipulates that authorities must prove a web site be actually engaged in online piracy by the selling or distribution of counterfeit items ranging from music CDs to perfumes to movie DVDs to pharmaceuticals to just about any consumer product.
Advocates of the law cite the economic damage to both consumers and businesses if nothing were done to stop the onrushing tide of pirated and counterfeit items into the US. Opponents to the law at the time of passage cited the possible damage to the domain naming process and the lack of an appeal process for web site owners.
A separate legal process does allow the owners of any property seized, which in this case are the domain names, to appeal in court that the items seized were not related to the named crime. However, the only company to try such an appeal, Rojadirecta, failed to prove to the court's satisfaction that the company's dot-com and dot-org domains seized last January under COICA were not linked to the stated crime of pirated video streams of sports events. Rojadirecta had claimed the pirated streams only appeared on their web sites in forums dedicated to downloads, an area over which the company claimed to have no control -- the court disagreed.
A full list of the latest set of seized domains can be found at the Scribd web site.
Domain Seizures
Last week, the domain names for about 150 web sites allegedly accused of selling counterfeit goods were seized by the US Department of Homeland Security. The law allowing these seizures passed Congress and was signed by the President last year as the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA). It was first used last November to seize about 70 websites said to be involved in distributing pirated content or selling counterfeit items; this last set of seizures brings the total to 350 domains.
Add Your Thoughts
-
2012-05-16Combating Online Sales of Counterfeit Luxury Products
A new tactic is being used by fashion companies trying to stop the online sale of counterfeit versions of their trademark luxury products. Up until about ten years, ago, companies like Chanel and Louis Vuitton w...0Comment -
2012-05-10
Recent PHP Patching Symptomatic of Larger Problems
A recent double release of patches by the PHP Group to remedy a vulnerability in Web servers is symptomatic of a problem that those who are responsible for Web servers know all too well. When a vulnerability is ... -
2012-05-08
Shopping Carts for Cyber-Crime
Last month, government takedowns of criminal websites revealed a disturbing trend: the use of e-commerce to sell illegal data. We've all used online shopping carts and clicked the checkout button on many commerc...
-
2012-05-03CISPA Passed by US House of Representatives
The Cyber Information Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) that was passed by the US House of Representatives last week by a vote of 248 to 168 appears to be the next piece of computer-related legislation that wil... -
2012-04-26Sophisticated Automated Web Attacks on the Rise
A recent report on the source and types of application hacking attacks upon Web servers highlights the linked growth of two characteristics, sophistication and automation, for the first few months of 2012. Web a... -
2012-04-24
Australian ISPs and Copyright Infringement
The war over copyright infringement between Big Media and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) is not confined solely (of course) to the United States and Europe. Recently, a court battle was won by iiNet Limited, ...
-
2012-04-20Emailed Bomb Threats in Pittsburgh
Federal authorities, attempting to trace back three threatening emails that were sent over the last few months to Pennsylvania reporters about bombs supposedly planted at the University of Pittsburgh, found a we... -
2012-04-17
Paying for Megaupload's Servers
Anyone who played the game of Hot Potato as a child will instantly understand the current situation of the fees for servers involved in the Megaupload case. Last January, the popular file-sharing web site was se...
-
2012-04-12
File Inclusion Attacks Most Prevalent in 2011
Attacks on web servers by hackers is one of those events most feared by web hosting providers. Besides being categorized by the damage done, these events can also be classified by the type of technique used in t... -
2012-04-03The Data Cloud Expands
Several trends have started to coalesce recently into a pattern that augurs well for the growth of cloud computing as a service that can be sold to customers who are already purchasing web hosting services. Clou...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

